Current:Home > ScamsHere's how each Supreme Court justice voted to decide the affirmative action cases -Elevate Capital Network
Here's how each Supreme Court justice voted to decide the affirmative action cases
View
Date:2025-04-28 01:56:48
The Supreme Court decided 6-3 and 6-2 that race-conscious admission policies of the University of North Carolina and Harvard College violate the Constitution, effectively bringing to an end to affirmative action in higher education through a decision that will reverberate across campuses nationwide.
The rulings fell along ideological lines. Chief Justice John Roberts wrote the majority opinion for both cases, and Justice Clarence Thomas, Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh wrote concurring opinions. Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote a dissenting opinion. Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson has ties to Harvard and recused herself in that case, but wrote a dissent in the North Carolina case.
The ruling is the latest from the Supreme Court's conservative majority that has upended decades of precedent, including overturning Roe v. Wade in 2022.
- Read the full text of the decision
Here's how the justices split on the affirmative action cases:
Supreme Court justices who voted against affirmative action
The court's six conservatives formed the majority in each cases. Roberts' opinion was joined by Thomas, Samuel Alito, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett. The chief justice wrote that Harvard and UNC's race-based admission guidelines "cannot be reconciled with the guarantees of the Equal Protection Clause."
"Respondents' race-based admissions systems also fail to comply with the Equal Protection Clause's twin commands that race may never be used as a 'negative' and that it may not operate as a stereotype," Roberts wrote. "The First Circuit found that Harvard's consideration of race has resulted in fewer admissions of Asian-American students. Respondents' assertion that race is never a negative factor in their admissions programs cannot withstand scrutiny. College admissions are zerosum, and a benefit provided to some applicants but not to others necessarily advantages the former at the expense of the latter. "
Roberts said that prospective students should be evaluated "as an individual — not on the basis of race," although universities can still consider "an applicant's discussion of how race affected his or her life, be it through discrimination, inspiration, or otherwise."
Supreme Court justices who voted to uphold affirmative action
The court's three liberals all opposed the majority's decision to reject race as a factor in college admissions. Sotomayor's dissent was joined by Justice Elena Kagan in both cases, and by Jackson in the UNC case. Both Sotomayor and Kagan signed onto Jackson's dissent as well.
Sotomayor argued that the admissions processes are lawful under the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
"The Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment enshrines a guarantee of racial equality," Sotomayor wrote. "The Court long ago concluded that this guarantee can be enforced through race-conscious means in a society that is not, and has never been, colorblind."
In her dissent in the North Carolina case, Jackson recounted the long history of discrimination in the U.S. and took aim at the majority's ruling.
"With let-them-eat-cake obliviousness, today, the majority pulls the ripcord and announces 'colorblindness for all' by legal fiat," Jackson wrote. "But deeming race irrelevant in law does not make it so in life."
Melissa Quinn contributed to this report.
- In:
- Affirmative Action
- Supreme Court of the United States
veryGood! (92)
Related
- Travis Hunter, the 2
- The US Wants the EU to Delay Imposing Trade Penalties on Carbon-Intensive Imports, But Is Considering Imposing Its Own
- Pink’s Daughter Willow Singing With Her Onstage Is True Love
- When Autumn Leaves Begin to Fall: As the Climate Warms, Leaves on Some Trees are Dying Earlier
- Paula Abdul settles lawsuit with former 'So You Think You Can Dance' co
- Lionel Messi Announces Move to Major League Soccer, Rejecting $400 Million Offer From Saudi Arabia
- War on NOAA? A Climate Denier’s Arrival Raises Fears the Agency’s Climate Mission Is Under Attack
- Woman dies while hiking in triple-digit heat at Grand Canyon National Park
- Average rate on 30
- U.S. Suspends More Oil and Gas Leases Over What Could Be a Widespread Problem
Ranking
- What do we know about the mysterious drones reported flying over New Jersey?
- Jennie Ruby Jane Shares Insight Into Bond With The Idol Co-Star Lily-Rose Depp
- RHOC's Tamra Judge Reveals Where She and Shannon Beador Stand After Huge Reconciliation Fight
- The Ultimatum’s Lexi Reveals New Romance After Rae Breakup
- New data highlights 'achievement gap' for students in the US
- Leandro De Niro-Rodriguez, Robert De Niro's grandson, dies at age 19
- Beyoncé Handles Minor Wardrobe Malfunction With Ease During Renaissance Show
- Leandro De Niro-Rodriguez, Robert De Niro's grandson, dies at age 19
Recommendation
The White House is cracking down on overdraft fees
IPCC: Radical Energy Transformation Needed to Avoid 1.5 Degrees Global Warming
Texas teen who reportedly vanished 8 years ago while walking his dogs is found alive
Warming Trends: A Climate Win in Austin, the Demise of Butterflies and the Threat of Food Pollution
2 killed, 3 injured in shooting at makeshift club in Houston
What's closed and what's open on the Fourth of July?
Activists sue Harvard over legacy admissions after affirmative action ruling
Despite soaring prices, flexible travelers can find budget-friendly ways to enjoy summer getaways
Like
- Federal court filings allege official committed perjury in lawsuit tied to Louisiana grain terminal
- Vanderpump Rules' Lala Kent Slams Narcissist Tom Sandoval For Ruining Raquel Leviss' Life
- Biden’s Climate Credibility May Hinge on Whether He Makes Good on U.S. Financial Commitments to Developing Nations